Skip to main content
All posts

Top Short-Squeeze Candidates Today: August 7, 2026 — 7-Factor Leaderboard

HTZ leads Tapeboard's August 7, 2026 short-squeeze leaderboard with a composite score of 100/100, as threshold-list concentration and multi-day momentum dominate the top-ranked candidates.

TL;DR: As of market close on August 7, 2026, HTZ leads Tapeboard's 7-factor squeeze leaderboard with a score of 100/100, driven by a 3.3 days to cover metric.

Tapeboard's daily squeeze scan ranked 25 stocks by composite score on August 7, 2026, combining seven factors: short interest as a percentage of float, annualized borrow fee, float utilization, the FINRA Consolidated NMS short-volume ratio, days to cover, five-day price momentum, and week-over-week borrow-fee change — each z-scored against a live ~500-stock universe. The dominant pattern across today's top 25 is FINRA threshold concentration, with 24 of the ranked names flagged for >=50% short-side volume over the last 7 trading days, frequently amplified by positive 5-day price momentum.

Today's August 7, 2026 Squeeze Score Leaderboard

RankSymbolSqueeze ScoreSI % FloatBorrow FeeDays to CoverMom 5dT
1HTZ100.03.3+22.1%T
2WB91.120.7%20.8-2.6%T
3SVRA86.726.2%20.8+6.8%T
4INDI84.333.2%11.7+25.1%T
5KOD83.926.5%13.7+9.1%T
6OCGN80.631.7%18.9+4.1%T
7BLNK80.211.1%15.6T
8RH80.042.3%7.4+18.5%T
9ASAN79.338.7%6.8+11.3%T
10ARCT78.726.8%10.7+28.6%T
11EVGO78.131.3%14.1+2.5%T
12XRX78.031.2%14.0+9.8%T
13CRMD77.623.1%17.0-1.2%T
14IBRX77.534.1%11.9+6.6%T
15CHWY76.950.2%3.1+4.1%T

*Source: Tapeboard composite squeeze model, August 7, 2026. Seven factors z-scored vs a ~500-stock universe. Short interest per FINRA settlement schedule; borrow fees from IBKR stock-loan availability; short-volume from FINRA Consolidated NMS. Not investment advice.*

What Drove Today's Rankings

The dominant signal pattern across the top 10 names is the combination of a FINRA threshold flag with positive 5-day price momentum, as seen in INDI with a score of 84.3 and momentum of +25.1%. WB breaks this pattern as the lowest-ranked top-10 outlier with negative momentum of -2.6%, carrying an 91.1 composite score primarily through its 20.8 days to cover and 20.7% short interest. The composite relies on a 35% weighting for short interest and a 25% weighting for borrow fee, though borrow fee and float utilization components are null for HTZ, requiring its 100.0 score to be reweighted across the remaining factors.

Top 5 Names

1. HTZ — Squeeze Score 100/100

HTZ earns the top spot with a 100.0 composite score, driven by 3.3 days to cover and a +22.1% 5-day price momentum. The stock is on the FINRA threshold list. Short interest and borrow fee data are null, so the score reweighted across the remaining factors.

2. WB — Squeeze Score 91.1/100

WB ranks second with a 91.1 composite score, supported by 20.7% short interest and 20.8 days to cover. The stock carries a FINRA threshold flag. Its 5-day price momentum is -2.6%, and borrow fee data is null, so the score reweighted across the remaining factors.

3. SVRA — Squeeze Score 86.7/100

SVRA scores 86.7, anchored by 26.2% short interest and 20.8 days to cover. The stock is flagged on the FINRA threshold list and shows a +6.8% 5-day price momentum. Borrow fee data is null, so the score reweighted across the remaining factors.

4. INDI — Squeeze Score 84.3/100

INDI holds an 84.3 composite score, driven by 33.2% short interest and 11.7 days to cover. The stock is on the FINRA threshold list. Its 5-day price momentum is +25.1%, and borrow fee data is null, so the score reweighted across the remaining factors.

5. KOD — Squeeze Score 83.9/100

KOD captures the fifth slot with an 83.9 composite score, featuring 26.5% short interest and 13.7 days to cover. The stock carries a FINRA threshold flag. Its 5-day price momentum is +9.1%, and borrow fee data is null, so the score reweighted across the remaining factors.

Factor Breakdown: How the Score Is Built

The Tapeboard composite squeeze score is built on a static weighting model to identify short squeeze candidates. The weights are 35% SI%Float (FINRA), 25% Borrow Fee (IBKR), 20% Float Utilization, 15% Days to Cover, and 5% 5-day momentum (Schwab). Each factor is z-scored against a live universe of roughly 500 stocks. See the methodology for the exact calculations. Data is attributed solely to FINRA, IBKR, Schwab, SEC, and the exchanges (NYSE/NASDAQ).

Frequently Asked Questions

What are the top short-squeeze candidates today?

As of August 7, 2026, the top three short-squeeze candidates by composite score are HTZ with a score of 100.0, WB with a 91.1 score, and SVRA with an 86.7 score. HTZ has a null short interest and null borrow fee, WB has 20.7% short interest and a null borrow fee, and SVRA has 26.2% short interest and a null borrow fee.

How does Tapeboard calculate its squeeze score?

Tapeboard calculates its composite squeeze score by z-scoring seven factors—short interest, borrow fee, float utilization, FINRA short-volume ratio, days to cover, 5-day momentum, and fee change—against a ~500-stock universe. The z-scores are then weighted: 35% for SI%Float, 25% for Borrow Fee, 20% for Float Utilization, 15% for Days to Cover, and 5% for 5-day momentum.

When does short-interest data update?

Short interest data lags approximately two weeks per the FINRA settlement schedule. Borrow fees from IBKR stock-loan availability and FINRA Consolidated NMS short-volume threshold data update on a daily basis.

Data and Methodology

  • Squeeze score: Tapeboard composite, recomputed nightly.
  • Short interest: FINRA, ~2-week settlement lag.
  • Borrow fee: IBKR stock-loan availability, daily.
  • Short-volume threshold: FINRA Consolidated NMS, daily.
  • Momentum: Schwab, end-of-day.

See today's highest borrow fees for the full hard-to-borrow ranking, or the live squeeze leaderboard for tomorrow's update.

This post is for educational and informational purposes only and is not investment advice. Short selling carries unlimited downside risk. A quantitative composite does not predict price, and past squeezes are not indicative of future moves. Editor: Marcus Reilly.